Since this is my last question to Aaron, let me first thank him for his participation here.
Aaron -- you have completely misunderstood my last question. The point is not that John and Peter are the same person, but plainly distinct persons. The ways we can know that for them are the ways we can know the same regarding Jesus and the Father.
So I ask you: given the explanation of this I gave in my previous answer, why do the tests we would use to distinguish between Peter and John not apply to the same clear distinctions in Scripture we see between the Father and the Son?
Aaron -- you have completely misunderstood my last question. The point is not that John and Peter are the same person, but plainly distinct persons. The ways we can know that for them are the ways we can know the same regarding Jesus and the Father.
So I ask you: given the explanation of this I gave in my previous answer, why do the tests we would use to distinguish between Peter and John not apply to the same clear distinctions in Scripture we see between the Father and the Son?
This is centuri0n, aka Frank Turk, who has been an internet apologist for about 10 years and has never really gained anything for himself through it but a handful of friends and a lot of ill-will. Most people, honestly, do not like to argue with him because he doesn't know how to let it go. He's a blogger of some minor note, and he's a "calvinist".
Posts
