Over at TeamPyro, I made a post and included the following graphic:
Faithful reader and gadfly Kent Brandenburg is offended by that image and has said this about it:
Is your permiscuous cartoon pure, lovely, good report, or virtuous? Is it an example to believers in purity? Does it conform to the spirit of the age? Are you saying that as long as something is a cartoon, it can be as pornographic as anyone wants it?He now has the opportunity to square-up to all that here at DebateBlog and demonstrate how much better his view of Scripture is than mine.
You go off on a tract that looks like a $20 bill and you can't see the problem with that picture? This isn't about prudery, some excessive attention to decorum, as if this is a matter of taste. Purity would be a better word.
Any time I've disagreed with you, Frank, you've rarely dealt with me Scripturally. Most times is your standard name-calling ("kook") or some sort of wink-wink sarcasm. That ought to be tell-tale to you.
I'm excited -- I might actually learn something.
This is centuri0n, aka Frank Turk, who has been an internet apologist for about 10 years and has never really gained anything for himself through it but a handful of friends and a lot of ill-will. Most people, honestly, do not like to argue with him because he doesn't know how to let it go. He's a blogger of some minor note, and he's a "calvinist".
Posts
